Save time
Review a large number of potential sites — automatically.
¶ Site Selector
Site Selector automatically analyzes and ranks charging-infrastructure sites by their potential serviceable market — so you can quickly, easily, and inexpensively identify and prioritize which sites to focus on first.
¶ 01 · Why it matters
Review a large number of potential sites — automatically.
Reduces the need for in-house analysts.
Allocate resources to the sites most worth pursuing.
Identify the sites with the highest probability of success.
¶ 02 · How it works
You input your candidate site addresses. We add the market signals that decide demand:
Site Selector then returns a ranked list of every site by potential customer demand for charging — and ancillary — services. Ranking is a function of traffic and the number of competing charging locations near each proposed site.
¶ 03 · Built to replace manual site evaluation
¶ 04 · What you get
A clean, business-ready ranking table — your shortlist at a glance.
An executive summary with visualizations, ready to share.
Comprehensive data for internal use and deeper review.
Illustrative
Each report includes a summary table by rank; deep-dive explanations of every site's score are provided in the detailed report.
Let's talk
Brightmerge · Site Selector
Five Tier-A sites carry the majority of recoverable value across the portfolio — led by Los Angeles · I-5 Sylmar at a 2.1-year payback.
Top-ranked sites
| # | Location | Tier | Net / yr | IRR | Payback |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles · I-5 Sylmar | A | $2.41M | 34% | 2.1 yr |
| 2 | San Diego · I-805 Sorrento | A | $1.94M | 31% | 2.4 yr |
| 3 | San Jose · US-101 Berryessa | A | $1.72M | 29% | 2.6 yr |
| 4 | Sacramento West | B | $1.21M | 22% | 3.3 yr |
| 5 | Fresno East | C | $0.61M | 12% | 5.1 yr |
Illustrative — figures shown for demonstration only.